The Reality TestWork with me

Ujjwal Prakash / Work with me

A clear problem.
A useful
contribution.

Tell me where you are, what is getting in the way and what progress would look like. We can work out the right shape of collaboration.

Ujjwal is the person you work with. Heerax Labs is the implementation arm, with responsibilities agreed for each engagement.

03Work with me

Four ways
to contribute.

Sometimes the need is another person on the team. Sometimes it is a few weeks spent on one stubborn workflow. Here are the ways I can contribute, with the scope made explicit.

01 / Full-time product roles

Join your product team.

For a team hiring an Associate Product Manager, Product Analyst, AI Product contributor or Founder’s Office operator with a product focus.

Suitable problems
Discovery needs structure, requirements need clarity, or a product team needs hands-on analysis and delivery support.
Deliverables
  • Problem and discovery briefs
  • Requirements, workflows and priorities
  • Product analysis and metric definitions
  • Cross-functional delivery support
Responsibility boundary
Contribution within an agreed role and reporting structure. No claim of executive product leadership or ownership of specialist engineering, legal or financial decisions.
How it starts
Share the role and team → discuss responsibilities and relevant work → follow your hiring process.

02 / Part-time product execution

Keep execution moving.

For founders and product teams who have a direction but need a defined contribution alongside their existing team.

Suitable problems
A backlog needs shaping, requirements are blocking delivery, or a specific workflow needs sustained follow-through.
Deliverables
  • Backlog refinement and prioritisation
  • Acceptance criteria and delivery briefs
  • Workflow specifications
  • Review notes, blockers and handover
Responsibility boundary
A bounded workstream and agreed time commitment. This is execution support, not fractional CPO leadership, unlimited availability or line management.
How it starts
Identify the workstream → agree capacity and outputs → review progress at an agreed cadence.

03 / Discovery & MVP consulting

Define the useful first step.

For a founder or team that needs to clarify the problem and decide what is worth building before committing to implementation.

Suitable problems
The user, scope or first release is unclear; too many features compete; assumptions need a practical validation plan.
Deliverables
  • Problem, user and assumption map
  • MVP scope and alternatives
  • Prioritised workflows and requirements
  • Validation questions and next-step brief
Responsibility boundary
Research access and evidence collection are agreed explicitly. Recommendations are hypotheses where evidence is incomplete; implementation and commercial outcomes are not included by default.
How it starts
Review the context and available evidence → agree discovery scope → deliver and discuss a decision-ready brief.

04 / Heerax Labs implementation

Build something useful.

The service-delivery arm for a defined website, MVP or operational workflow that can be reviewed against agreed acceptance criteria.

Suitable problems
A clear scope is ready to become a website, dashboard, internal tool or bounded AI-assisted workflow.
Deliverables
  • Websites and scoped MVPs
  • Dashboards and internal tools
  • AI-assisted or automation workflows
  • Reviewable build and agreed handover
Responsibility boundary
Integrations, hosting, data handling, production hardening, specialist reviews and maintenance are scoped separately. No enterprise-scale capability or ongoing support commitment is implied.
How it starts
Agree the workflow and acceptance criteria → build a reviewable slice → test the scope → document the handover.

Start with
the context.

For a role, share the team and responsibilities. For a project, share the user, current workflow, timeline and intended result. Scope and deliverables are agreed before work begins.

Start a conversation